From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.0.20040427093624.0aca10b0@pop.noos.fr>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: Philippe Anel <philippe.anel@noos.fr>
Subject: Re: [9fans] an idea
In-Reply-To: <caa397ab0dc056150949f7347fefbb43@vitanuova.com>
References: <6.0.0.22.0.20040426202214.0ae43d80@pop.noos.fr>
 <caa397ab0dc056150949f7347fefbb43@vitanuova.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 09:44:31 +0200
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6f58312c-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

At 22:27 26/04/04, you wrote:
> > I think capabilities would help here.
>
>the namespace is a capability.

Yes. But devices are not in that namespace.
Every process has access to #, hence the
need to have RFNOMNT and exceptions in namec().
Without #, there is no need to have both
exceptions in namec and RFNOMNT.

Regards,
         Philippe.