From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.2.20040202083618.03a91398@mail.village.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
From: Wes Kussmaul <wes@village.com>
Subject: Re: [9fans] another VM type host
In-Reply-To: <200402020905.i12952jE019197@skeeve.com>
References: <200402020905.i12952jE019197@skeeve.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Date: Mon,  2 Feb 2004 08:40:01 -0500
Topicbox-Message-UUID: ca554a66-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025



Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't Xen development backed by Microsoft?

Not that that would necessarily be a stopper for anyone, but people should
be aware of it.

Wes Kussmaul


At 04:05 AM 2/2/2004, you wrote:
>A friend recently pointed me at:
>
>         http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/
>
>The guest OS runs in x86 ring 1, instead of ring 0, so the OS must actually
>be ported to work with it.  Has any 9developer seen this yet?
>
>Arnold