From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-Id: <6.0.2.0.0.20060411131957.01cacad0@pop.monitorbm.co.nz> Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:26:49 +1200 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> From: Andrew Simmons Subject: Re: [9fans] Good enough approximation for ape/pcc In-Reply-To: <3e1162e60604101707v6214a809h516a223bf5d14a06@mail.gmail.co m> References: <229aaef51090aa24504f7f55d106b8c2@quanstro.net> <6.0.2.0.0.20060411100415.01cb6490@pop.monitorbm.co.nz> <200604102304.k3AN4vJN003576@haides.silverbrookresearch.com> <3e1162e60604101618u4e4ce0c1yac9f0246a116a2e5@mail.gmail.com> <20060410235110.GM28006@submarine> <3e1162e60604101707v6214a809h516a223bf5d14a06@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Topicbox-Message-UUID: 348d15a4-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 >There's apparently very good money in knowing these little >esoteric bits about C++ though :). For a depressingly typical example the following site is enlightening: http://www.gotw.ca/gotw/ The good news is that things are going to get a whole lot more complicated, because, obviously, the way to make C++ easier to use is to add more features: http://www.artima.com/cppsource/cpp0xP.html Are there any plans to add a -Wtpop switch to the Plan 9 compilers?