From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <600308d605091014412b6d1b71@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 23:41:09 +0200 From: Francisco Ballesteros To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] hacking issue: memory resizing In-Reply-To: <20050910021917.QAK10334.ibm62aec.bellsouth.net@p1.stuart.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <600308d605090913461de1965@mail.gmail.com> <20050910021917.QAK10334.ibm62aec.bellsouth.net@p1.stuart.org> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 87984918-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Are you using user-level programs called to synchronize? We are doing the same. Look for repl in the Plan B man page. On 9/10/05, Brian L. Stuart wrote: > In message <600308d605090913461de1965@mail.gmail.com>, Francisco Balleste= ros wr > ites: > > You have just files and services (including devices). You want your > >laptop (or PDA) to work standalone, but you still want the stateless ter= minal > >that Plan 9 provides (so you have to administer just one or a few machin= es). > >To me, it seems that replicating (sort of caching, like in coda) your F= S into > >your standalone machines is the easy way to do that. The only inconvenie= nce >=20 > As it turns out, I've been playing around with some ideas in > that direction. I've got a rough prototype in Plan 9 and a > slightly less rough one in Linux using FUSE. I didn't like > coda's special server code, so I took the approach of keeping > two trees synchronized. That way you can connect to the file > server you're caching with 9P or NFS or SMB or... It's been > proving handy allowing my laptop to cache stuff from work > and stuff from home at the same time. Hopefully, I'll get > company permission to release the code soon. >=20 > BLS >