From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <602d022987958658e5d9467747b97ed5@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sat,  8 Nov 2008 06:47:12 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1226108725.17713.153.camel@goose.sun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Do we have a catalog of 9P servers?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 363570ba-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Sure. But that would an argument in favor of the Plan 9/Inferno
> kernel architecture, not the protocol itself. Nobody's denying
> that 9P is a perfect match to that kind of kernel architecture.
> What I'm trying to find out is whether the protocol could stand
> its own ground even if Plan9 kernel is not serving nor muxing it.

this depends entirely on your criteria and constraints.

- erik