From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: cinap_lenrek@gmx.de (cinap_lenrek at gmx.de) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:11:15 +0100 Subject: [9fans] new dial, cs and dns for ipv6 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <6030ca036e779c5485206f8027ec1376@gmx.de> Topicbox-Message-UUID: bc7bf926-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 thinking about it more... all what needs to be parallelized is the write of the connect message so no backchannel is needed except for reporting error/success (already done with the waitmsg in geoffs implementation). so it looks quite doable without any shared memory. still, might take some time to come up with a small and clean implementation. so what are you going todo for now geoff? a lib9p like forker that gets filled in by libthread is kind of a overkill. also the code would need rewriting as you cant preserve rfork semantics with shared stacks (you need to pass a function pointer and arguments because the child has to run on a new allocated stack). -- cinap -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: erik quanstrom Subject: Re: [9fans] new dial, cs and dns for ipv6 Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:38:03 -0400 Size: 2561 URL: