From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <607ca85c52e009595be2e5235772e8d2@proxima.alt.za>
To: lucio@proxima.alt.za, 9fans@9fans.net
From: Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:27:55 +0200
In-Reply-To: <d4994b84508f6970c63ab163158e5ac1@proxima.alt.za>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] That deadlock, again
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 855505be-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Yes, this is the type of explicit-ness I was thinking of.  Note that
> you can now drop further tests for up == 0 later in the qlock() text.

Hm, spoke too quickly.  The tests on "up" have to remain, sadly.
Sorry about the misleading noise.

++L