From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <6104d1669942e762ba6bd4ab80bfca37@cat-v.org>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] new compilers
Date: Mon,  3 Apr 2006 23:02:06 +0200
From: uriel@cat-v.org
In-Reply-To: <6e35c0620604031341k3effda87i762a2cc511bdbb82@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2dd7536e-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> On 4/3/06, Bruce Ellis <bruce.ellis@gmail.com> wrote:
>> i recall a prof who bought a mac becasue "it wasn't unix" and "it wasn't intel".
>> that was years ago .... things have changed huh?
>
> Speaking of which, does anyone have any opinion of Objective-C, other
> than the preponderance of things like
> kAudioHardwarePropertyBootChimeVolumeRangeDecibels in the prevalent
> code?

I would rather ask:

	"What is wrong with C?"

 and then

	"What is wrong with C that Limbo didn't fix?"


Maybe 9fans should be renamed lunix-history-buffs-and-apple-fanboys...

uriel