From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <614eaa1fdb126c41fb92fd215356eae8@smgl.fr.eu.org>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: "Mathieu" <lejatorn@gmail.com>
Date: Sun,  1 Feb 2009 22:29:34 +0100
In-Reply-To: <48be394f2ae6b463cedb7b0e3959e513@quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx as a cpu server?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 918a681c-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> > As I naively see it, the two main problems are:
> > 1) to have 9vx running a cpu server kernel instead of a stand alone
> > terminal one (I don't even know if that's the case actually).
>
> i think there would be a little work in getting this going.

Ok, so it's possible then. :)
I'll see if I can understand the 9vx code and have a go at that.

> > 2) to have the host forwarding whatever packets should go to 9vx.
>
> is this enough?
>
> http://9fans.net/archive/2008/12/501
> http://9fans.net/archive/2008/12/505

Hmm I'm not sure, do these modifications imply that the Linux/FreeBSD
host can "see" 9vx as another host? Hence making it possible to NAT the
relevant traffic to it?
If yes, then that's indeed what I'm after, thx.

Cheers,
Mathieu