From: David Presotto <presotto@closedmind.org>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] libfmt/libutf and long double
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:11:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <614ead90cdcf809c60ab4ee24ae5b495@plan9.bell-labs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B0EB7C6-3BC1-11D8-906F-000A95C53D8A@suspicious.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
On plan 9 double and long double are the same. Therefore, the
fact that the libfmt library ignores the ll part of the %llE
doesn't break anything on plan 9 but does on Unix.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 3274 bytes --]
From: suspect@suspicious.org
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] libfmt/libutf and long double
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 13:43:31 -0500
Message-ID: <3B0EB7C6-3BC1-11D8-906F-000A95C53D8A@suspicious.org>
Hello,
Actually, my curiosity was about why it worked on my
Plan 9 machine but gave the strange behavior when
using libfmt on a UNIX system.
From http://www.cs.bell-labs.com/magic/man2html/2/fprintf:
"... or an optional L specifying that a following e, E, f, g,
or G conversion specifier applies to a long double argument."
The above made it make sense to me that it worked on
my Plan 9 machine. I'm therefore a bit confused by your
response. Thanks.
cheers,
On Dec 31, 2003, at 11:17 AM, Russ Cox wrote:
>
> yes, plan 9 doesn't implement long double and your unix does.
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've run into a behavior with libfmt/libutf on UNIX system
>> that does not seem intuitive:
>>
>> long double ldv = 3.3;
>> print("long double var = %llE\n", ldv);
>>
>> gives:
>> long double var = -6.257775E+92
>>
>> Identical code under Plan 9 gives the expected output of:
>>
>> long double var = 3.300000E+00
>>
>> Is there any particular reason why the behaviors should
>> differ in this manner ?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-31 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-30 3:10 suspect
2003-12-30 3:30 ` David Presotto
2003-12-31 16:17 ` Russ Cox
2003-12-31 18:43 ` suspect
2003-12-31 19:11 ` David Presotto [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=614ead90cdcf809c60ab4ee24ae5b495@plan9.bell-labs.com \
--to=presotto@closedmind.org \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).