From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jens Staal <staal1978@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 09:42:00 +0200
Message-ID: <6270901.iqtIslEohE@krypton>
User-Agent: KMail/4.11.1 (Linux/3.11.0-1-ARCH; KDE/4.11.1; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <94594e360af74d88545fc8c2358c4c44@brasstown.quanstro.net>
References: <56b14cb05fe9efa2d1c1ee474b6434c7@proxima.alt.za>
	<94594e360af74d88545fc8c2358c4c44@brasstown.quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Subject: Re: [9fans] incompatible type signature
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7e5c53dc-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thursday 12 September 2013 01:21:38 erik quanstrom wrote:

>
> i believe all the type signature problems in 9atom's ape have been sorted
> out. if you find something that does not work, it will be fixed.
>
> - erik

On 9atom 1 out of two type signature conflicts got resolved when I tried to
build GNU nano (using FGB's PDcurses, rebuilt on 9atom to avoid that character
width or something might be an issue).

The resolved issue was some sort of internal conflict in libbsd bind. The
remaining issue gives the following linking error (for nano) and is a conflict
between libbsd and libdraw:

??none??: incompatible type signatures 50220469
(/386/lib/ape/libdraw.a(screen)) and 9bbe58(/386/lib/ape/libbsd.a(bind)) for
bind