[9fans] MIPS - P9P acme seems OK

[9fans] MIPS - P9P acme seems OK

[lucio]

Is it unreasonable for me to rejoice that P9P compiles without (much)
trouble on the Yeeloong (Orchid) Notebook from Lemote?  I started acme
and superficial use suggests that it will work on this particular MIPS
architecture without any hitch.  I must concede that it is a point in
favour of GCC.

Russ warned me that I may need to make significant adjustments to get
this to work, I must report that his fears seem to be unfounded.  I
will run a cvs diff later in the day to make sure that I haven't
forgotten anything, I will post the details to this list as soon as
I'm comfortable with them.

++L

Re: [9fans] MIPS - P9P acme seems OK

[erik quanstrom]

On Fri May 22 10:29:54 EDT 2009, lucio@proxima.alt.za wrote:
> Is it unreasonable for me to rejoice that P9P compiles without (much)
> trouble on the Yeeloong (Orchid) Notebook from Lemote?  I started acme
> and superficial use suggests that it will work on this particular MIPS
> architecture without any hitch.  I must concede that it is a point in
> favour of GCC.

in favor of gcc over against what?  p9p always uses gcc.

- erik

Re: [9fans] MIPS - P9P acme seems OK

[lucio]

> in favor of gcc over against what?  p9p always uses gcc.

In favour of GCC.  It promises portability and in this case, at least,
it delivers.  This is mips-l, but I note that it is not the 64-bit
model ;-(  I must look into that.

++L