From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Wed,  7 May 2014 14:48:02 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <631a67d68fe5ca99316efb4af2c21156@ladd.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <9c36aa004fd39d2723028d2979b13536@pi.att>
References: <9c36aa004fd39d2723028d2979b13536@pi.att>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] [GSOC] plan9 which arch code to use?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e0c36556-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Wed May  7 14:33:08 EDT 2014, sl@9front.org wrote:
> > if everybody does their own thing, perhaps we spend all our collective
> > time doing the same thing, and no progress is made?
>
> Most of the duplicated effort never seems to make it out
> to the public, so for users, the point is often moot.

right, perhaps because it is duplicated and there is no one version.

> The forks of Plan 9 exist mainly because people want to
> run Plan 9 on their computers.

would be nice to put all the hardware support together.

- erik