From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a3d8f244f00be51b2b9f80895be0be93@quanstro.net>
References: <dd6fe68a0909011622l20f9e6abv2f3ebf75254b3e1e@mail.gmail.com>
	<a3d8f244f00be51b2b9f80895be0be93@quanstro.net>
Date: Wed,  2 Sep 2009 10:01:00 +0200
Message-ID: <64399b170909020101n10787c71qf10f9fd5147274e2@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcsOpcyBEb23DrW5ndWV6?= <andresdju@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] lowest valid stack address
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5e06d07e-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

2009/9/2 erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>:
>
> aside: from the overcommit vm discussion.
> in http://9fans.net/archive/2000/06/634 rob
> says that plan 9 doesn't overcommit vm.
> what's the history here?

Exactly two years ago you started a thread about
memory overcommit. If I remember correctly, plan9
overcommits vm. Few weeks later the Go program
from gorka crashed while allocating the stack, maybe
an overcommiting check was added, probably gorka
knows.

Andr=C3=A9s