From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan9 VM for Windows/Linux? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482) From: suspect To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <4a4616872e042989ec3257d1b4c44963@centurytel.net> Message-Id: <64580E00-016A-11D7-AF22-000393477E42@suspicious.org> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 13:10:49 -0500 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2857c366-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 If a virtualisation of the hardware is what's wanted, then why not go for Inferno ? (Aside from not being able to run your C programs, but there are ways around that). cheers, On Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 09:19 AM, Skip Tavakkolian wrote: >>> As for a C compiler generating Dis, I believe that Dis >>> cannot express all the things that one can do in C. >> >> It could be done, by mapping all C objects into a single >> large Dis object and all code into a single module, for >> example, also providing hooks to get at some of the non-C >> features. But why? > > The original thread was 'what if instead of drawterm there was a > Dis-style VM and there was a C compiler for Dis so that you can > run Plan9 term under other OS, without VMware'. >