From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <646ff839a4d2833721b02a7428038704@coraid.com> From: erik quanstrom Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 20:28:51 -0500 To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] Another amusing glibc day ... In-Reply-To: <283f5df10801041707vcfd2d22x882f77ecb6992d1c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: 27970b0a-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > well, uClibc & dietlibc are rather limited. *BSD libc is a viable option, as > is Sun's. > Honestly though, if we're going to do something as radical as get rid of > glibc, can we please do a little better? Might as well fix everything else > wrong, like, oh, say BSD SOCKETS! > =) sockets are not an invention of the c library, regardless of what drepper thinks. you'll have to swap out the operating system to do that. ... wait a second. - erik