From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <64bf51aa33c53a357228f5e63d8a9e68@mightycheese.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Okay, who's been playing with the cheese wiz?
From: "rob pike, esq." <rob@mightycheese.com>
In-Reply-To: <200302092120.h19LKBM29830@augusta.math.psu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sun,  9 Feb 2003 17:07:10 -0800
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 539fd72a-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

The win problem has been fixed, as Russ mentioned.

The two acme things you report are both the same; the
stack trace corresponds to the error message you report
from bufread.  (The %r that results from calling error() in
bufread is worthless; the error is totally internal.)

There's a good chance you have a real bug; I've seen
stacks like this before and have tracked them down
successfully.  I can't reproduce your symptom, though.

There is a slim chance it's related to a recent change to
acme regarding how the undo sequence number is
maintained. Slim.

-rob