From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:17:37 -0400
To: rvs@sun.com, 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <64debd1118fe0541e4b377bfbb18b2a2@coraid.com>
In-Reply-To: <1224063742.4463.145.camel@goose.sun.com>
References: <26c1814ccfc8559a96987385a144c4e7@quanstro.net>
	<1224063742.4463.145.camel@goose.sun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] several things
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1e95c41e-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> > 	; mntgen a
> > 	; bind /env a/env
> > 	; bind /bin a/bin
> > 	; bind /proc a/proc
> > 	; bind a /
> > 	; ns
> >
> > consider it a security feature.
>
> Be it as it may, I still can't quite follow why *manual* pruning
> of the entries from the namespace would be forbidden. unmount(2)
> takes two strings as arguments, right? It doesn't even need an fd.

because they're not visible.  you have to access
it in order to unmount it.

- erik