From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <65361697cad97f45895b7d5dd9bcf946@terzarima.net> From: Charles Forsyth Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 16:24:13 +0000 To: 9fans@9fans.net In-Reply-To: <8662t4s05p.fsf@cmarib.ramside> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] RESOLVED: recoving important header file rudely Topicbox-Message-UUID: a6942aa2-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 >The docs I've read seem to >suggest that gcc is kind of "glued onto the side of" Plan 9 proper. it's kind of unglued off the side of Plan 9 proper: gcc came unstuck (in more ways than one). i'm afraid it's harder to port (or do i mean compile?) than it ever was. and then there's glibc, which you'll certainly also need ... something must be done! (and that's certainly a lot of something.)