From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <674ae8054940252e987a3fe0f9781804@vitanuova.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] accept in dial(2)
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 18:51:20 +0100
From: rog@vitanuova.com
In-Reply-To: <fa2bd26e06e99ec4303411b3e28ec90b@collyer.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: d5a52c3c-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> A quick kernel grep suggests that only /sys/src/9/port/devsdp.c still
> recognises the word "accept"

and this seems incompatible in another way with accept(2);
it looks like the "accept" control message expects a whole
pathname (which is then passed to namec()), whereas
accept(2) just passes the number of the newly open connection.

i guess SDP isn't much used...