From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <676c3c4f0802111449h7f9e0ae7h421ea563441c7b92@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 17:49:18 -0500
From: "Richard Bilson" <rcbilson@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] s3venti
In-Reply-To: <9f69e5c07b90abc5a43f9031921adcb9@9netics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <95720658912c7b8567ed713b0ac7459f@quanstro.net>
	<9f69e5c07b90abc5a43f9031921adcb9@9netics.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 504df54a-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> and an issue related to the
> fact that we need to encrypt users' data.

For the record, s3venti does encrypt blocks that it writes to S3. It
uses a single key, making it rather vulnerable to dictionary attacks,
but I haven't come up with a way to do better without changing the
venti protocol. Suggestions are welcome.