From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <676c3c4f0803201223i3a055c86if035520f97b937cf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:23:01 -0400
From: "Richard Bilson" <rcbilson@gmail.com>
To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@9fans.net>
In-Reply-To: <84b81b7b75b737d2876d795fe7dc377e@proxima.alt.za>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <84b81b7b75b737d2876d795fe7dc377e@proxima.alt.za>
Subject: Re: [9fans] EWOULDBLOCK in APE
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7d3c1168-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

>  APE does not include EWOULDBLOCK in its <errno.h>.  I have a feeling
>  that no syscall will return EWOULDBLOCK as an error code, so I fail to
>  see any reason not to include it.  Am I missing something?

I think it's common on UNIX systems for EWOULDBLOCK to be a synonym for EAGAIN.