From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <678d3d35419366ba1ccc0df67eb9ba2a@quintile.net>
From: "Steve Simon" <steve@quintile.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 23:57:59 +0100
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Re: patch/list sorry/nbroken-8
In-Reply-To: <c9b8386f82b75be6378776d02fe355f5@cat-v.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2594134a-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Note that others have also reported broken procs 'vanishing', probably
> because they didn't know there was a limit and that the limit was so
> low.

That is a missquote, I said I noticed broken
processes being tidied up.

I am glad of it, I had httpd commiting hari-kari a
dozen times a day a week or two ago and was very pleased
the broken procs didn't build up.

-Steve