From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <67bdc370488932a3a59652e43f72fa33@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: Lucio De Re <lucio@proxima.alt.za>
Date: Fri,  2 Dec 2011 17:59:26 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20111202143311.GD7640@dinah>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Building Go on Plan 9
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4bca1702-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> I plan to switch from GNU Make to APE make
> once I have the time to look closely at the
> Go Makefiles for any GNU specific features
> and then make the necessary changes or even
> modify ape/make.

I have had the most recent version of Gmake running as the APE tool of
choice, but I seem to have misplaced it.  Still, no need to treat
Gmake and ape/make as different, they should be close enough for all
intents and purposes.

In fact, compiling Gmake itself is not much of a mission, unlike bison.

++L