From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] coraid ethernet console
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 10:29:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <67cf068f2fc015f9ac04cf05828b9b95@coraid.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee9e417a0703190639o5dacb3cah2f671dd8c310849e@mail.gmail.com>
hanks for the thoughtful response, russ.
On Mon Mar 19 09:40:26 EDT 2007, rsc@swtch.com wrote:
> > 1. consolefs doesn't yet speak cec. (good soc project.)
>
> as long as you have a cec client that presents a file,
> consolefs should be able to read it. consolefs doesn't
> speak serial either.
cec(1) doesn't currently present a file. it is modeled on con.
there should be something like /net/cec, but i haven't done
that work yet.
>
> what is the relation between cec and this ethernet console?
> http://www.usenix.org/events/usenix03/tech/freenix03/kistler.html
i would suspect that there is little relationship. cec doesn't do
tcp, ip nor framebuffers. can someone point me to a protocol
document?
> it would be nice if they could use the same protocols, though
> i don't know how complicated the freenix one is. ericvh?
>
> is the protocol documented somewhere other than the code?
the protocol documentation is in cec/Protocol.
>
> security?
>
the main security mechanism is that cec is an unrouted ethernet
protocol. cec packets are not encapsulated in ip or (tcp/udp).
thus one would have to be on the local segment to access a
machine's cec console.
there is a password mechanism, but there is no encryption.
this is ment to be a reminder and not real security. the password is
sent in the clear.
since servers generally have more interfaces than they need these
days, one could set up a seperate network for cec and other management
functions, if one were interested in the utmost in security.
-erik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-19 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-18 22:56 erik quanstrom
2007-03-19 13:39 ` Russ Cox
2007-03-19 14:29 ` erik quanstrom [this message]
2007-03-19 14:34 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=67cf068f2fc015f9ac04cf05828b9b95@coraid.com \
--to=quanstro@coraid.com \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).