From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <680c2ed5b58b0229497b6d4157631c76@quanstro.net>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:16:33 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20080429121624.GC3705@secousse.ipgp.jussieu.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan 9 on an IBM eserver 325
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 9c21edd2-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Heh, you got me there. It's just that I was too lazy to rewrite all the
> stuff by hand. I only compared what was on the screen to that previous
> message and when I saw the value were the same I pasted again the old
> message. But I had indeed noticed that line was absent.
> So yeah, with the old 9load that line is not there and it still panics.
>
> Mathieu.

have you verified that the PC=3 with the older 9load?  with an
actual program counter, finding the problem would be easier.

- erik