From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <6841721662a4264fad861b00a47a2a46@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Date: Sat,  3 Jan 2009 06:37:58 +0200
From: lucio@proxima.alt.za
In-Reply-To: <5d375e920901021916s4a4e0279l574ba7ce352952b8@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] rio in cpu/auth server in vmware fusion 2.0
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 762346ca-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> The strange thing with drawterm+inferno is that even video playback
> over drawterm seems to work better than the painful redrawing of wm
> apps.

But inferno under drawterm seems superfluous to me.  It can't be
totally impractical to run inferno in parallel with drawterm on the
same platform rather than on the Plan 9 server.  There may be some
disadvantages, but it must be possible to overcome them.

++L