From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@labs.coraid.com>
Date: Mon,  2 Dec 2013 16:47:05 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <68d80b98d734718ee0c1384b5f786975@coraid.com>
In-Reply-To: <3ECF6CAF-1E56-4E1F-A2EB-AEA58E036B3F@corpus-callosum.com>
References: <5fc4ecdb1523a9dbda1829df0018500a@proxima.alt.za>
	<20131202183901.Horde.so34A23woqwLYjKomWz6Ag1@ssl.eumx.net>
	<CAJSxfm+XhN8-axjaZgn1V9U5fRX3dMmNC4kftNA7=zC-bR54XQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<74126e01b30ebb946afb3adcd8705e01@coraid.com>
	<20131202212426.0730342a@zinc.9fans.fr>
	<efdf4aefcd4516a74041019bc857491e@coraid.com>
	<CAJSxfmLc7COxpSGSo9s_NjKHvfc=phsv-hVrjM0jDvb9EpFbYw@mail.gmail.com>
	<3ECF6CAF-1E56-4E1F-A2EB-AEA58E036B3F@corpus-callosum.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Go and 21-bit runes (and a bit of Go status)
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 8ebd75d0-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mon Dec  2 16:46:10 EST 2013, jas@corpus-callosum.com wrote:
> Well, not Plan 9 per se, but APE, yes.  APE was crusty, old, and
> not supporting the bulk of the POSIX APIs that all the current
> systems are using.
>
> So yes, changes to APE are required.

but only insofar as ape is wrong!  this is a big difference with go.
more details to come.

- erik