From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <692c0e1167666d49f8287ad1bf3f7b71@swtch.com>
To: fernanbolando@mailc.net, 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Good enough approximation for ape/pcc
From: "Russ Cox" <rsc@swtch.com>
Date: Fri,  7 Apr 2006 15:10:11 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1d5d51400604071201n5f308eeco519feb9d76023d62@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc:
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 32b9f288-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> did you mean use gcc directly?

i meant pcc.

> I am not sure If I understood you correctly but to clarify my original question.
>
> Sometimes when I dont have access to my plan 9 system and my only computer
> is a linux box I want to check if a piece pf code will compile under ape.

you could ask tip9ug or one of the other net systems nicely for an account.
and then use drawterm.

> is there a way to use gcc so that it will behave more like the ape tools?

no.

russ