From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <692ed54ad031129fe6c742d8cb168986@hera.eonet.ne.jp>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:41:13 +0900
From: kokamoto@hera.eonet.ne.jp
In-Reply-To: <E1C943EF-25D9-4EF9-8EAE-282B10C79FE2@lsub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] nix at lsub
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7729f386-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> I have in the todo yet another
> ui system to run on top
> of other systems. for terminals.

We have now:
(1) plan9port which is very clear where only
plan9 like user interface would be developed.
(2) inferno approach where proprietary language
	is neccessary, and resists top of another OS.
(3) plan9 or nix or 9front, traditional style of OS
developement

In basic, I like the (3) approarch, but undocumented
device problem.  (1) is clear, however I feel something
unfilled in my heart...

Your intension is to develope two ways, one for
server (nix), and one for terminal (like drawterm?)

Kenji