From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <69898e3538bf13a71cf2403dd5e3d48e@hamnavoe.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] why I'm messing with python: mercurial
From: Richard Miller <9fans@hamnavoe.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2006 09:30:53 +0000
In-Reply-To: <13426df10612232126p669bd6eaq1411e0546c5dcd7@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f98f8b3e-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> I can't wait to try out plan 9 + xen on a
> dual-core, it's already reasonably fast.

I've run it on a two-processor VIA vt310.  An extra cpu does help with
responsiveness.  Would it be worthwhile to support multiple virtual
processors in the guest Plan 9?  It's just a matter of coding the
start-up for the extra processors ("just" - of course it's
undocumented).

-- Richard