9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: quanstro@quanstro.net
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] gnupg or pgp for plan9?
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:17:27 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <699553fd641e4d70ce360ad04b2f8ff6@quanstro.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D71DABB-0EFE-4A27-B6AD-73B59B2BFB80@telus.net>

i don't personally know any lazy engineers, but i do know quite a few that are scared of
being the scapegoat.

i worked on a big full-text search project that never wrote its own
search engine.  we used OpenText pat, pls/cpl (later bought by aol), excalibur,
inktomi hosted search and probablly a few that have been forgotten.  these interfaces
were very difficult to write because what we needed from a full-text search engine
was never what was provided, they all had major bugs and performace was generally very
poor.

yet -- though i'm convinced it would have been easier, and the results better --
nobody had the guts to write an engine.

- erik

On Tue Mar 28 20:08:59 CST 2006, plalonde@telus.net wrote:
>
> It happens because engineers are too lazy or scared to try to
> understand the code they are modifying, and a layer seems safer.  My
> case was 3 years of 2 code teams.  Imagine 10 years of open-source-
> like distributed development :-(
>
> Paul
>


  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-29  3:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-28  0:48 erik quanstrom
2006-03-28 14:59 ` Anthony Sorace
2006-03-28 15:23   ` Bruce Ellis
2006-03-28 15:57 ` Gabriel Diaz
2006-03-28 17:29   ` Charles Forsyth
2006-03-28 17:47     ` Gabriel Diaz
2006-03-29  0:27       ` Fernan Bolando
2006-03-29  2:49         ` geoff
2006-03-29  7:29           ` geoff
2006-03-29  2:07     ` Paul Lalonde
2006-03-29  3:17       ` quanstro [this message]
2006-03-29  3:56         ` Paul Lalonde
2006-03-29  9:09       ` Taj Khattra
2006-03-29 16:02         ` uriel
2006-03-29 22:03           ` Taj Khattra
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-29  1:13 erik quanstrom
2006-03-27  4:30 Fernan Bolando
2006-03-27  6:50 ` geoff
2006-03-27  7:25 ` Steve Simon
2006-03-27  9:18   ` Fernan Bolando
2006-03-27 13:10     ` Lluís Batlle
2006-03-27 17:26       ` Fernan Bolando
2006-03-28  0:38     ` Anthony Sorace
2006-03-28 13:59   ` Eric Grosse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=699553fd641e4d70ce360ad04b2f8ff6@quanstro.net \
    --to=quanstro@quanstro.net \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).