9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ori@eigenstate.org
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] Throwing in the Towel
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 23:32:39 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6CF300A17E86168075C422519C7A1A24@eigenstate.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8169.1716949347@lunacy.ugrad.cs.cmu.edu>

Finally,. SSDs just die over time. Especially if they are
not powered on and refreshing. JEDEC specs say that they
should retain data for 1 year unplugged when stored at 30
degrees celsius, assuming the internet isn't lying to me.

Keep backups.

Quoth Dave Eckhardt <davide+p9@cs.cmu.edu>:
> > For the napkin calculation: On disk, the IEntry is 38Bytes.  Alas,
> > writes occur always in (the ssd internal) blocksize.  So, essentially
> > (assuming 4096 byte blocksize, which is quite optimistic), we have
> > a write efficiency of less than 1 percent.
> 
> While I see how such a model can predict disaster, I don't think that
> model matches how FTLs work, because it can't.
> 
> Many file systems (FAT, ext2/3/4) write the same logical block over
> and over and over and over and over.  I think the default interval
> for ext4 to synch the superblock and the journal is five seconds,
> which if true is more than 15,000 times every *day* for a busy
> file system (and I think lots of Linux systems are busy in that
> sense).
> 
> > A good firmware in the ssd could avoid needing a new block for the
> > write, if all bits are changed in teh same direction by the new
> > data.
> 
> Again, I believe this model predicts that no regular Linux file
> system can be used on any SSD, thus I believe this model is not
> accurate.
> 
> To quote Wikipedia:
> 
>   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_memory_controller
> 
> > The mapping units of an FTL can differ so that LBAs are mapped
> > block-, page- or even sub-page-based.  Depending on the usage
> > pattern, a finer mapping granularity can significantly reduce
> > the flash wear out and maximize the endurance of a flash based
> > storage media.
> 
> Also, I feel as if this point is several assumption layers deep.
> I think one user reported an unknown number of failures in two
> sets of SSDs of unknown brand and model.  I don't think we know
> that it was venti SSDs that went bad as opposed to fossil SSDs,
> let alone knowing it was index SSDs for venti.
> 
> > It seems, venti in its current form is a ssd killer, if they
> > are used for the isects.
> 
> I don't think this claim is yet supported well.
> 
> Dave Eckhardt

------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T2ca67486c7a13a77-M076297816c8a30d15e67368f
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-29  3:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-04 15:13 Steven Stallion
2024-05-04 19:16 ` [9fans] Plan9 wept! - " Alexandr Babic
2024-05-04 20:21 ` [9fans] " Shawn Rutledge
2024-05-04 20:37   ` wb.kloke
2024-05-26 19:39     ` wb.kloke
2024-05-26 21:20       ` Riddler
2024-05-27  1:06       ` Dave Eckhardt
2024-05-28 19:33         ` wb.kloke
2024-05-28 21:49           ` Charles Forsyth
2024-05-29  2:22           ` Dave Eckhardt
2024-05-29  3:32             ` ori [this message]
2024-05-29  6:40               ` Steve Simon
2024-05-29  8:29                 ` wb.kloke
2024-05-29  8:17               ` hiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6CF300A17E86168075C422519C7A1A24@eigenstate.org \
    --to=ori@eigenstate.org \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).