From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <6DA86118-AE52-45AE-912A-BD3E238ED2E5@lsub.org>
From: Francisco J Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.org>
To: "9fans@9fans.net" <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8;
	format=flowed;
	delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 5H11)
Date: Fri,  6 Mar 2009 21:36:39 +0100
Subject: Re: [9fans] Google Summer of code 2009
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b4fcd168-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

If anyone is looking for projects I am working on USB and it's for =20
sure there will be many drivers that could be done once the controller =20=

drivers get finished, what shouldn't take much time now. I'm willing =20
to help anyone willing  to work on such "projects".
Acpi is also needed asap.

Probably it's better to get working and forget about gsoc before doing =20=

something.
IMHO
El 06/03/2009, a las 21:27, anothy@gmail.com escribi=C3=B3:

> uriel, remain calm. he said the discussion was among the people who
> ran last year's application. that's fine: they can have whatever
> conversations they like, wherever they like. if they've decided their
> time is better spent elsewhere, that's their decision.
>
> on the specific actions suggest, too, i'm all for them. it sounds like
> they're thinking about some very directed actions that could get good
> results. and those sorts of actions also, in my estimation, match with
> the sorts of "community" considerations Google uses for evaluation.
> there's certainly no conflict there.
>
> for myself, i still think a GSoC application is worth the time, and I
> still intend to do one.
>
> [/mail/box/nemo/msgs/200903/35660]