> On Sep 2, 2016, at 3:00 PM, Bakul Shah wrote: > > Separately, an interesting project would be to implement plan9 > sandboxes (ala linux "containers" or freebsd "jails)" so that > one can easily set up a cluster of plan9 boxes. Namespaces would make that an easy application, no? There is no required user/kernel interface in 9P, so why not?