From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <138575260903040610u4950702es60d0e5c0f78503f2@mail.gmail.com> <2772b418c31186cdd12c944173fda946@quanstro.net> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 11:12:07 +0000 Message-ID: <6a3ae47e0903060312u47cb3dedg969a547b40af8698@mail.gmail.com> From: Robert Raschke To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] acme Put doesn't save Topicbox-Message-UUID: b4ca95f4-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Rudolf Sykora wrote: > It really seems that acme-sac does save in the described way (at least > it saves). That makes me wonder. Do plan9 acme, p9p acme and acme-sac > have more similar differences? Are the programs separate in their > development? Acme-sac is based on the Inferno Acme, which is written in limbo and has a few minor discrepancies to the P9 acme (for example, backspace with text selected only deletes the selected text, it doesn't delete the character prior to it). Acme-sac is a life saver on windows. I couldn't live without it. Big thank yous go out to caerwyn for this work. Robby