On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Roman V. Shaposhnik <rvs@sun.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 09:27 +0100, Robert Raschke wrote:
>
> > Last time I tried, the standard Lua compiled out of the box under the
> > APE.
>
> That is good to know. Still, I'd rather see it run without APE.
>
> > Great little language. I use it in my day job (together with Erlang).
>
> *together* with Erlang?!?! That I have to know more about. Perhaps
> off-list.
>
> >  It's implementation is indeed just as enlightening as the Plan 9
> > code. An exercise in doing exactly what is required and no more. Very
> > elegant in my eyes.
>
> Couldn't agree more!
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
>
>