On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Roman V. Shaposhnik
<rvs@sun.com> wrote:
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 09:27 +0100, Robert Raschke wrote:
> Last time I tried, the standard Lua compiled out of the box under the
> APE.
That is good to know. Still, I'd rather see it run without APE.
> Great little language. I use it in my day job (together with Erlang).
*together* with Erlang?!?! That I have to know more about. Perhaps
off-list.
> It's implementation is indeed just as enlightening as the Plan 9
> code. An exercise in doing exactly what is required and no more. Very
> elegant in my eyes.
Couldn't agree more!
Thanks,
Roman.