From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <6a65a8b751540b784b8cbff84466ad36@hera.eonet.ne.jp>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Xen for Windows(Was:vmware 5.0)
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2005 10:22:55 +0900
From: kokamoto@hera.eonet.ne.jp
In-Reply-To: <1f70eed92820114027bf6274a290ead3@hera.eonet.ne.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7ecafd3a-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Last night I must have been too sleepy.   I can't read my own
posting this morning.=E2=98=BA  Then, I'll try once more.

> if you just want to run only Plan9.

Actually, I never understand such kind of attempts.
What is the merit to use mutiple OSs on a machine?
>>From a bad humor sense, I can realize it only for saving
power...

Once, I thought it'd be nice if I could use Xen for Linux and Plan 9
web server to use UTF-8 encoded our page.   However, I realized
it not so essential after that.  Now, I'm thinking like this: if I need=20
Windows, let's have a machine for it. If I need Plan 9 let's have=20
three machine for it, etc.   Machines are cheeper these days,=20
so it must be only for saving power for mother earth.=E2=98=BA

Better?

I'm not offending the one machine model for Plan 9 from the
view point of more convenience to more people.   However, I think=20
Geoff's effort should be payed more attention by more Plan 9ers.

Kenji