From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 06:34:49 -0400
To: lucio@proxima.alt.za, 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <6b38de346a9fc846a24cf6114d2ad4c7@kw.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <464534aea8c7fffa248a1368c41acb55@proxima.alt.za>
References: <464534aea8c7fffa248a1368c41acb55@proxima.alt.za>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Go/Inferno toolchain (Was: comment and newline in
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 3737d42e-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> My particular concern is to encourage convergence towards a single
> source distribution rather than divergence as seems to have been the
> case so far with Plan 9 native, Inferno, p9p and now Go. What I have
[...]
> And, obvious sequitur, what would it take to replace Plan 9's "patch"
> approach with a "codereview" one?  It seems to me that everyone might
> benefit from it.

i suppose it needs saying: bell labs, not to be confused with google, ...

- erik