From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Thu,  8 May 2014 08:07:02 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <6b60334820caa92abcba5ca05d2fa63e@mikro.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <b3b4847220111d22d1401fddddaeb5aa@proxima.alt.za>
References: <b3b4847220111d22d1401fddddaeb5aa@proxima.alt.za>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] [GSOC] plan9 which arch code to use?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e2de8d52-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu May  8 07:22:41 EDT 2014, lucio@proxima.alt.za wrote:
> >> Now, this is incompatible with the original Soundblaster stuff and no
> >> one seems to care to deal with the incompatibilities.
> > wrong. it has been dealed with.
>
> Not in the Bell Labs distribution, it hasn't.  At least, not that I noticed.
>
> And that was just a convenient example.

i'm quoting from your original post:

	Now, this [ac97] is incompatible with the original Soundblaster stuff and no
	one seems to care to deal with the incompatibilities.  That's where

so, someone (cinap) does care about the incompatabilities and has addressed them.
i think what you're saying is nobody has gotten this in to the distribution.
fair point.  why don't you submit a patch?

- erik