From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 11:35:09 -0400 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <6beb97f6c439c31ec01bde74fd988e14@brasstown.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: <80C18EAC-B025-4EDA-B89C-1DF5418168EE@9srv.net> References: <53295712.1050505@gmail.com> <80C18EAC-B025-4EDA-B89C-1DF5418168EE@9srv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] GSoC proposal: Alternative window system Topicbox-Message-UUID: cc143374-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Wed Mar 19 11:33:58 EDT 2014, a@9srv.net wrote: > > I'm still voting for touch interface > > Not to be pedantic, but note that there isn't any "voting" > here. Students come up with a proposal for something > they'd be interested in working on for the summer, and > the prospective mentors order them and fill however > many slots we get (short version). I'd love a touch > interface, too, but if a student is interested in doing a > dwm-like interface but not interested in touch, they > should write a proposal for a dwm-like interface. thanks, i was too subtile about this point. - erik