From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <6c224497bf50efa48d06a0a304fc5918@caldo.demon.co.uk> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] g++ From: Charles Forsyth In-Reply-To: <20030915145443.GA8164@sigint.cs.purdue.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-jtznbkcyfhgnnmyzpyzhcfviap" Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 23:33:39 +0100 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 38d9f384-eacc-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-jtznbkcyfhgnnmyzpyzhcfviap Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit i believe it is much quicker and indeed far more effective to reverse the polarity of the neutron flow. --upas-jtznbkcyfhgnnmyzpyzhcfviap Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-path: <9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu> Received: from punt-3.mail.demon.net by mailstore for forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk id 19yulI-0003wc-4j; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 14:55:33 +0000 Received: from [130.203.4.6] (helo=mail.cse.psu.edu) by punt-3.mail.demon.net with esmtp id 19yulI-0003wc-4j for forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 14:55:32 +0000 Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id 8337E19B87; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:55:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from psuvax1.cse.psu.edu (psuvax1.cse.psu.edu [130.203.4.6]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id BB45D19B74; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:55:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Delivered-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Received: by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server, from userid 60001) id 5386219B7A; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:54:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sigint.cs.purdue.edu (sigint.cs.purdue.edu [128.10.2.82]) by mail.cse.psu.edu (CSE Mail Server) with ESMTP id B12FE19B14 for <9fans@cse.psu.edu>; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:54:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: by sigint.cs.purdue.edu (Postfix, from userid 118) id 3CD16CD6E; Mon, 15 Sep 2003 09:54:43 -0500 (EST) From: splite@purdue.edu To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] g++ Message-ID: <20030915145443.GA8164@sigint.cs.purdue.edu> References: <5.1.1.6.0.20030915100743.00a98ff0@pop.monitorbm.co.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.1.1.6.0.20030915100743.00a98ff0@pop.monitorbm.co.nz> X-Disclaimer: Any similarity to an opinion of Purdue is purely coincidental Sender: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu Errors-To: 9fans-admin@cse.psu.edu X-BeenThere: 9fans@cse.psu.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.cse.psu.edu> List-Archive: Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 09:54:43 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,NO_REAL_NAME,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 10:13:05AM +1200, Andrew Simmons wrote: > > Because we weren't anywhere near smart enough to build a working > > kernel in C++. > > But surely, if you'd built a Use Case Driven Object Model of the kernel > using UML, and used the Generic Iteration Workflow concept of the Rational > Unified Process for the Implementation Phase, you would have had no trouble > at all. You'd still need to slap it with a phased verteron pulse, which would depolarize the resonance frequency generators and generate a subspace field implosion, inducing a reload of the positronic subprocessors from the protected memory archive. Duh. --upas-jtznbkcyfhgnnmyzpyzhcfviap--