Re: [9fans] this is not an advocacy question

[Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com>]

anyone thinking about this, could you consider restricting it
to the subset of Java libraries (and the few syntax restrictions)
that Google's web toolkit supports?   That way it could be compiled
to HTML/Javascript using GWT compiler.

> I think there´s no problem. It´s not mine. It´s made by a student
> as one of his projects. I don´t have the source right now (I think he didn´t
> copy it to our main file server). As soon as I get the source I´ll drop a line
> here (it may take a few days).
> 
> Also, to avoid confussion, it´s a server-side library, not a client side library
> (although it could be used for that as well).
> 
> 
> On 5/26/06, Roman Shaposhnick <rvs@sun.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:51:05AM +0200, Fco. J. Ballesteros wrote:
>> > :  I believe that the current Styx will interoperate with 9P2000, but
>> > :  haven't tried it myself.
>> >
>> > One of my students made a 9p library in Java, (I know...), and
>> > it can speak well with Inferno (no auth, though).
>>
>>   Nemo, would it be possible to share this library with the rest of us ?
>>   We're currently trying to tie our GUI "lego-bricks" together and having
>>   them talk in 9p would be a big plus.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Roman.