From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <6d951644ba47af56237a3ceb9204c2f0@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Date: Sun,  4 Jan 2009 20:27:52 +0200
From: lucio@proxima.alt.za
In-Reply-To: <dd6fe68a0901040904p20666ac7sd141ee70b9ad28c4@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] RFNOMNT
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 78a97a22-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> I agree that it would be nice if the exceptions were
> documented in the man page.  They are quite nicely
> documented in the code, though:

That's easy enough to do, I'm sure.  I'll look into that and see if I
can build the confidence for a patch to, I presume, rfork(2)?

The rationale is also at least to a large extent in the quoted
comments, congratulations to the implementor.  Is there a nice
practical example one can use in the man page too?  That would be very
helpful in understanding the value and possibly the limitations of
RFNOMNT.

++L