From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:04:30 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <6dcda8d871ab3643e001b3583cbf875e@lilly.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAEAzY3-ExHEG-6w26pb5XXFHJYmEUcxzxiTY68CkyF_2NNTozw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20141118132939.B91F11B5BC9@wolfman.devio.us>
	<25fc57d2bb0b43bbcf957577501c1201@posteo.de>
	<20141118154208.Horde.-lW_HrLDkU9P79z9xJFH7w9@ssl.eumx.net>
	<445f93dc54035581c54b6fa19b96f750@posteo.de>
	<CAEAzY3-ExHEG-6w26pb5XXFHJYmEUcxzxiTY68CkyF_2NNTozw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] running plan9 : an ideal setup?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2bddf07e-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue Nov 18 12:03:04 EST 2014, aram.h@mgk.ro wrote:
> If you must use a rpi, you should strive to use it as a terminal, and
> like every other Plan 9 terminal it should use the central file server
> without local storage.

+1.  if i understand correctly, the labs used physical security for the authentication
server, and it booted off a local fs.  while this is a very tidy idea, i think reality
booges things up, and it doesn't really work out.

- erik