From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <6e35c06204111613147839133c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 13:14:30 -0800
From: Jack Johnson <knapjack@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Plan 9 killer applications?
In-Reply-To: <70b89b72104ae7cd573a61dc83348534@plan9.ucalgary.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <b2e2b7aa0f53511fd8f6eb75b7451b92@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
	<70b89b72104ae7cd573a61dc83348534@plan9.ucalgary.ca>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 039f14ea-eace-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:17:08 -0700, andrey mirtchovski
<mirtchov@cpsc.ucalgary.ca> wrote:
> user-level "mount" and "bind" come a close second and third :)

I agree, along with Steve's venti + fossil.

Relatedly, I was thinking on the drive this morning that Inferno could
actually be an interesting alternative to either the standard p2p
networks or even freenet, with SSL and union mounts support you could
do some interesting things, in the "killer app" vein.

-Jack