From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <6e35c06204121715206e5ee022@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 15:20:54 -0800
From: Jack Johnson <knapjack@gmail.com>
To: David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com>,
	Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Acme mailreader
In-Reply-To: <3e1162e604121710527abe8fd5@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <3e1162e6041216070874f424e5@mail.gmail.com>
	<9ccf822edf0a9a77c141ae47312638dd@collyer.net>
	<3e1162e604121710527abe8fd5@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: 
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1a47432a-eace-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 10:52:51 -0800, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mac OS X is not a microkernel architecture... but it does "have a
> microkernel" :).

I wonder how much of this is just NeXT heritage rather than
purposefully to make the actual work of building/upgrading OS X any
easier (or any other potentially valid reason)?

-Jack