From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <6e35c0620602111911m180357dbx7fb7d8ad58adeff6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:11:56 -0800
From: Jack Johnson <knapjack@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: ASN.1 (Was: [9fans] More 'Sam I am')
In-Reply-To: <29095be2167dfa5925d361dc1ba0db39@quanstro.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <29095be2167dfa5925d361dc1ba0db39@quanstro.net>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: fd913526-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 2/11/06, quanstro@quanstro.net <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> suit yourself.  i'm pretty sure things have gotten better since
> dos TSR programs and sneaker nets.

That depends.

We have a site that used to be connected via T1, and when we were
looking at options for offsite backup we did the math and -- given the
distance -- anything bigger than about a CD's worth of data was faster
to walk over.

But, aside from that, I agree. :)

-J