From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <6f3d5eb2a102ffd5a93ff58482bfa3a9@9netics.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] making emalloc a library function
From: 9nut@9netics.com
In-Reply-To: <20040307172511.GA31935@melkki.cs.Helsinki.FI>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sun,  7 Mar 2004 10:45:27 -0800
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1f238274-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

> Also if one writes a malloc wrapper which 
> behaves unlike the emallocs naming it emalloc is quite confusing.

Not if emalloc is in the application in every instance.